|
|
MS Treatment

There is as yet no cure for MS. Many patients do well with no
therapy at all, especially since many medications have serious
side effects and some carry significant risks. Naturally
occurring or spontaneous remissions make it difficult to
determine therapeutic effects of experimental treatments;
however, the emerging evidence that MRIs can chart the
development of lesions is already helping scientists evaluate
new therapies.
Until
recently, the principal medications physicians used to treat MS
were steroids possessing anti-inflammatory properties; these include
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (better known as ACTH),
prednisone,
prednisolone,
methylprednisolone,
betamethasone, and
dexamethasone.
Studies suggest that intravenous
methylprednisolone may be superior to the more traditional
intravenous ACTH for patients experiencing acute relapses; no strong
evidence exists to support the use of these drugs to treat
progressive forms of MS. Also, there is some indication that
steroids may be more appropriate for people with movement,
rather than sensory, symptoms.
While
steroids do not affect the course of MS over time, they can
reduce the duration and severity of attacks in some patients.
The mechanism behind this effect is not known; one study
suggests the medications work by restoring the effectiveness of
the blood/brain barrier. Because steroids can produce numerous
adverse side effects (acne, weight gain, seizures, psychosis),
they are not recommended for long-term use.
One
of the most promising MS research areas involves naturally
occurring antiviral proteins known as interferons. Two forms of
beta interferon (Avonex®
and Betaseron®) have now been approved by the Food and Drug
Administration for treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. A third
form (Rebif®)
is marketed in Europe. Beta interferon has been shown to reduce
the number of
exacerbations/relapses and may slow the progression of
physical disability. When attacks do occur, they tend to be
shorter and less severe. In addition,
MRI scans
suggest that beta interferon can decrease
myelin destruction.
Modifying the Disease Course
The following agents can reduce disease activity and disease progression for many individuals with relapsing
forms of MS, including those with secondary progressive disease who continue to have relapses.
FDA-Approved Disease-Modifying Agents
|
|
|

|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|

|
|

|
Disease Management Consensus Statement (.pdf)
Recommendations and principles from the Society’s National Clinical Advisory Board for health care professionals and people with MS—to guide treatment with the disease-modifying drugs.
|
|
|

|
The Disease-Modifying Drugs (.pdf)
A booklet describing the approved use, dosage and route of delivery, side effects, benefits, and available support programs.
|
|
|

|
Patient Assistance Programs
A listing of the pharmaceutical company financial assistance programs to help manage the costs of the drugs.
|
|
|

|
Treatment Locations
These clinical facilities have a formal affiliation with the National MS Society. The appropriate chapter clinical advisory committee, composed of MS experts, has reviewed and approved the affiliation.
|
Investigators
speculate that the effects of beta interferon may be due to the
drug's ability to correct an MS-related deficiency of certain
white blood cells that suppress the immune system and/or its
ability to inhibit gamma interferon, a substance believed to be
involved in MS attacks. Alpha interferon is also being studied
as a possible treatment for MS. Common side effects of
interferons include fever, chills, sweating, muscle aches,
fatigue,
depression, and injection site reactions.
Scientists
continue their extensive efforts to create new and better therapies for MS.
Goals of therapy are threefold: to improve recovery from attacks, to prevent or
lessen the number of relapses, and to halt disease progression. Some therapies
currently under investigation are discussed below.
Immunotherapy
As evidence of immune system involvement in the development of MS has grown, trials
of various new treatments to alter or suppress immune response are being
conducted. These therapies are, at this time, still considered experimental.
Results
of recent clinical trials have shown that immunosuppressive agents and
techniques can positively (if temporarily) affect the course of MS; however,
toxic side effects often preclude their widespread use. In addition, generalized
immunosuppression leaves the patient open to a variety of viral, bacterial, and
fungal infections.
Over the years, MS investigators have studied a number of immunosuppressant
treatments. Among the therapies being studied are cyclosporine (Sandimmune),
cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan), methotrexate, azathioprine (Imuran), and total
lymphoid irradiation (a process whereby the MS patient's lymph nodes are
irradiated with x-rays in small doses over a few weeks to destroy lymphoid
tissue, which is actively involved in tissue destruction in autoimmune
diseases). Inconclusive and/or contradictory results of these trials, combined
with the therapies' potentially dangerous side effects, dictate that further
research is necessary to determine what, if any, role they should play in the
management of MS. Studies are also being conducted with the immune system
modulating drugs linomide (Roquinimex), cladribine (Leustatin), and
mitoxantrone.
Two other experimental treatments — one involving the use of monoclonal antibodies
and the other involving plasma exchange, or plasmapheresis — may have fewer
dangerous side effects. Monoclonal antibodies are identical, laboratory-produced
antibodies that are highly specific for a single antigen. They are injected into
the patient in the hope that they will alter the patient's immune response.
Plasmapheresis is a procedure in which blood is removed from the patient, and
the plasma is separated from other blood substances, which may contain
antibodies and other immmunologically active products. These other blood
substances are discarded and the plasma is then transfused back into the
patient. Because their worth as treatments for MS has not yet been proven, these
experimental treatments remain at the stage of clinical testing.
Bone marrow transplantation (a procedure in which bone marrow from a healthy donor is
infused into patients who have undergone drug or radiation therapy to suppress
their immune system so they will not reject the donated marrow) and injections
of venom from honey bees are also being studied. Each of these therapies carries
the risk of potentially severe side effects.
Therapy to Improve Nerve Impulse Conduction
Because the transmission of electrochemical messages between the brain and body is
disrupted in MS, medications to improve the conduction of nerve impulses are
being investigated. Since demyelinated nerves show abnormalities of potassium
activity, scientists are studying drugs that block the channels through which
potassium moves, thereby restoring conduction of the nerve impulse. In several
small experimental trials, derivatives of a drug called aminopyridine
temporarily improved vision, coordination, and strength when given to MS
patients who suffered from both visual symptoms and heightened sensitivity to
temperature. Possible side effects of these therapies include paraesthesia
(tingling sensations), dizziness, and seizures.
Therapies Targeting an Antigen
Trials of a synthetic form of myelin basic protein, called copolymer I (Copaxone®), have
shown promise in treating people in the early stages of relapsing-remitting MS.
Copolymer I, unlike so many drugs tested for the treatment of MS, seems to have
few side effects. Recent trial data indicate that copolymer I can reduce the
relapse rate by almost one third. In addition, patients given copolymer I were
more likely to show neurologic improvement than those given a placebo. The Food
and Drug Administration has made the drug available to people with early
relapsing-remitting MS through its "Treatment IND" program and is currently
reviewing data from a large-scale study to determine whether or not to approve
the drug for marketing.
Investigators are also looking at the possibility of developing an MS vaccine.
Myelin-attacking T cells were removed, inactivated, and injected back into
animals with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE). This procedure
results in destruction of the immune system cells that were attacking
myelin basic protein. In a couple of small trials scientists have tested a similar
vaccine in humans. The product was well-tolerated and had no side effects, but
the studies were too small to establish efficacy. Patients with progressive
forms of MS did not appear to benefit, although relapsing-remitting patients
showed some neurologic improvement and had fewer relapses and reduced numbers of
lesions in one study. Unfortunately, the benefits did not last beyond two years.
A similar approach, known as peptide therapy, is based on evidence that the body
can mount an immune response against the T cells that destroy
myelin, but this
response is not strong enough to overcome the disease. To induce this response,
the investigator scans the myelin-attacking T cells for the myelin-recognizing
receptors on the cells' surface. A fragment, or peptide, of those receptors is
then injected into the body. The immune system "sees" the injected peptide as a
foreign invader and launches an attack on any myelin-destroying T cells that
carry the peptide. The injection of portions of T cell receptors may heighten
the immune system reaction against the errant T cells much the same way a
booster shot heightens immunity to tetanus. Or, peptide therapy may jam the
errant cells' receptors, preventing the cells from attacking myelin.
Despite these promising early results, there are some major obstacles to developing
vaccine and peptide therapies. Individual patients' T cells vary so much that it
may not be possible to develop a standard vaccine or peptide therapy beneficial
to all, or even most, MS patients. At this time, each treatment involves
extracting cells from each individual patient, purifying the cells, and then
growing them in culture before inactivating and chemically altering them. This
makes the production of quantities sufficient for therapy extremely time
consuming, labor intensive, and expensive. Further studies are necessary to
determine whether universal inoculations can be developed to induce suppression
of MS patients' overactive immune systems.
Protein antigen feeding is similar to peptide therapy, but is a potentially simpler
means to the same end. Whenever we eat, the digestive system breaks each food or
substance into its primary "non-antigenic" building blocks, thereby averting a
potentially harmful immune attack. So, strange as it may seem, antigens that
trigger an immune response when they are injected can encourage immune system
tolerance when taken orally. Furthermore, this reaction is directed solely at
the specific antigen being fed; wholesale immunosuppression, which can leave the
body open to a variety of infections, does not occur. Studies have shown that
when rodents with EAE are fed myelin protein antigens, they experience fewer
relapses. Data from a small, preliminary trial of antigen feeding in humans
found limited suggestion of improvement, but the results were not statistically
significant. A multi-center trial is being conducted to determine whether
protein antigen feeding is effective.
Cytokines
As our growing insight into the workings of the immune system gives us new
knowledge about the function of cytokines, the powerful chemicals produced by T
cells, the possibility of using them to manipulate the immune system becomes
more attractive. Scientists are studying a variety of substances that may block
harmful cytokines, such as those involved in inflammation, or that encourage the
production of protective cytokines.
A drug that has been tested as a depression treatment, rolipram, has been shown to
reduce levels of several destructive cytokines in animal models of MS. Its
potential as a therapy for MS is not known at this time, but side effects seem
modest. Protein antigen feeding, discussed above, may release transforming
growth factor beta (TGF), a protective cytokine that inhibits or regulates the
activity of certain immune cells. Preliminary tests indicate that it may reduce
the number of immune cells commonly found in MS patients' spinal fluid. Side
effects include anemia and altered kidney function.
Interleukin
4 (IL-4) is able to diminish demyelination and improve the clinical course of
mice with EAE, apparently by influencing developing T cells to become protective
rather than harmful. This also appears to be true of a group of chemicals called
retinoids. When fed to rodents with EAE, retinoids increase levels of TGF and
IL-4, which encourage protective T cells, while decreasing numbers of harmful T
cells. This results in improvement of the animals' clinical symptoms.
Remyelination
Some studies focus on strategies to reverse the damage to myelin and oligodendrocytes
(the cells that make and maintain myelin in the
central nervous system), both of
which are destroyed during MS attacks. Scientists now know that oligodendrocytes
may proliferate and form new myelin after an attack. Therefore, there is a great
deal of interest in agents that may stimulate this reaction. To learn more about
the process, investigators are looking at how drugs used in MS trials affect
remyelination. Studies of animal models indicate that monoclonal antibodies and
two immunosuppressant drugs, cyclophosphamide and azathioprine, may accelerate
remyelination, while steroids may inhibit it. The ability of intravenous
immunoglobulin (IVIg) to restore visual acuity and/or muscle strength is also
being investigated.
Diet
Over the years, many people have tried to implicate diet as a cause of or treatment
for MS. Some physicians have advocated a diet low in saturated fats; others have
suggested increasing the patient's intake of linoleic acid, a polyunsaturated
fat, via supplements of sunflower seed, safflower, or evening primrose oils.
Other proposed dietary "remedies" include megavitamin therapy, including
increased intake of vitamins B12 or C; various liquid diets; and sucrose-,
tobacco-, or gluten-free diets. To date, clinical studies have not been able to
confirm benefits from dietary changes; in the absence of any evidence that diet
therapy is effective, patients are best advised to eat a balanced, wholesome
diet.
Unproven Therapies
MS is a disease with a natural tendency to remit spontaneously, and for which there
is no universally effective treatment and no known cause. These factors open the
door for an array of unsubstantiated claims of cures. At one time or another,
many ineffective and even potentially dangerous therapies have been promoted as
treatments for MS. A partial list of these "therapies" includes: injections of
snake venom, electrical stimulation of the spinal cord's dorsal column, removal
of the thymus gland, breathing pressurized (hyperbaric) oxygen in a special
chamber, injections of beef heart and hog pancreas extracts, intravenous or oral
calcium orotate (calcium EAP), hysterectomy, removal of dental fillings
containing silver or mercury amalgams, and surgical implantation of pig brain
into the patient's abdomen. None of these treatments is an effective therapy for
MS or any of its symptoms.
Drugs Used to Treat Multiple Sclerosis
Drugs currently available to patients Steroids
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone,
prednisone,
prednisolone,
methylprednisolone,
betamethasone, and
dexamethasone Interferons Beta interferons (Avonex®
and
Betaseron®) Beta interferon (Rebif®)—available
in Europe only Some experimental therapies Alpha interferon Cyclosporine
(Sandimmune) Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) Methotrexate Azathioprine (Imuran)
Linomide (Roquinimex) Cladribine (Leustatin) Mitoxantrone Aminopyridine,
derivatives of Copolymer I (Copaxone) Rolipram Interleukin 4 (IL-4) Retinoids
Total lymphoid irradiation Monoclonal antibodies Plasma exchange or
plasmapheresis Bone marrow transplantation Peptide therapy Various MS vaccines
Protein antigen feeding Transforming growth factor beta (TGF) Intravenous
immunoglobulin (IVIg)
Are Any MS Symptoms Treatable?
While some scientists look for therapies that will affect the overall course of the
disease, others are searching for new and better medications to control the
symptoms of MS without triggering intolerable side effects.
Many people with MS have problems with
spasticity, a condition that primarily
affects the lower limbs. Spasticity can occur either as a sustained stiffness
caused by increased muscle tone or as spasms that come and go, especially at
night. It is usually treated with muscle relaxants and tranquilizers. Baclofen
(Lioresal), the most commonly prescribed medication for this symptom, may be
taken orally or, in severe cases, injected into the spinal cord. Tizanidine
(Zanaflex), used for years in Europe and now approved in the United States,
appears to function similarly to baclofen. Diazepam (Valium), clonazepam
(Klonopin), and dantrolene (Dantrium) can also reduce spasticity. Although its
beneficial effect is temporary, physical therapy may also be useful and can help
prevent the irreversible shortening of muscles known as contractures. Surgery to
reduce spasticity is rarely appropriate in MS.
Weakness and
ataxia (incoordination) are also characteristic of MS. When weakness is a
problem, some spasticity can actually be beneficial by lending support to weak
limbs. In such cases, medication levels that alleviate spasticity completely may
be inappropriate. Physical therapy and exercise can also help preserve remaining
function, and patients may find that various aids—such as foot braces, canes,
and walkers—can help them remain independent and mobile. Occasionally,
physicians can provide temporary relief from weakness, spasms, and pain by
injecting a drug called phenol into the spinal cord, muscles, or nerves in the
arms or legs. Further research is needed to find or develop effective treatments
for MS-related weakness and ataxia.
Although improvement of optic symptoms (explanation of
Optic Neuritis) usually occurs even without treatment, a short course of
treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol) followed by
treatment with oral steroids is sometimes used. A trial of oral prednisone in
patients with visual problems suggests that this steroid is not only ineffective
in speeding recovery but may also increase patients' risk for future MS attacks.
Curiously, prednisone injected directly into the veins—at ten times the oral dose—did seem to
produce short-term recovery. Because of the link between optic neuritis and MS,
the study's investigators believe these findings may hold true for the treatment
of MS as well. A follow-up study of optic neuritis patients will address this
and other questions.
Fatigue,
especially in the legs (look at
symptoms), is a common symptom of MS and may be both physical and
psychological. Avoiding excessive activity and heat are probably the most
important measures patients can take to counter physiological fatigue. If
psychological aspects of fatigue such as depression or apathy are evident,
antidepressant medications may help. Other drugs that may reduce fatigue in
some, but not all, patients include amantadine (Symmetrel), pemoline (Cylert),
and the still-experimental drug aminopyridine.
People with MS may experience several types of pain. Muscle (Muscle Atrophy,
Muscle Cramps,
Muscle Spasticity,
Loss of Muscle Control or Uncontrolled Movements) and back pain can be helped
by aspirin or acetaminophen and physical therapy to correct faulty posture and
strengthen and stretch muscles. The sharp, stabbing facial pain known as
trigeminal neuralgia is commonly treated with carbamazapine or other
anticonvulsant drugs or, occasionally, surgery. Intense tingling and burning
sensations are harder to treat. Some people get relief with antidepressant
drugs; others may respond to electrical stimulation of the nerves in the
affected area. In some cases, the physician may recommend codeine.
As the disease progresses, some patients develop bladder malfunctions. Urinary
problems are often the result of infections that can be treated with
antibiotics. The physician may recommend that patients take vitamin C
supplements or drink cranberry juice, as these measures acidify urine and may
reduce the risk of further infections. Several medications are also available.
The most common bladder problems encountered by MS patients are urinary
frequency, urgency, or incontinence. A small number of patients, however, retain
large amounts of urine. In these patients, catheterization may be necessary. In
this procedure, a catheter or drainage tube is temporarily inserted (by the
patient or a caretaker) into the urethra several times a day to drain urine from
the bladder. Surgery may be indicated in severe, intractable cases. Scientists
have developed a "bladder pacemaker" that has helped people with urinary
incontinence in preliminary trials. The pacemaker, which is surgically
implanted, is controlled by a hand-held unit that allows the patient to
electrically stimulate the nerves that control bladder function.
MS patients with urinary problems may be reluctant to drink enough fluids, leading
to constipation. Drinking more water and adding fiber to the diet usually
alleviates this condition. Sexual dysfunction may also occur, especially in
patients with urinary problems. Men may experience occasional failure to attain
an erection. Penile implants, injection of the drug papaverine, and
electrostimulation are techniques used to resolve the problem. Women may
experience insufficient lubrication or have difficulty reaching orgasm; in these
cases, vaginal gels and vibrating devices may be helpful. Counseling is also
beneficial, especially in the absence of urinary problems, since psychological
factors can also cause these symptoms. For instance, depression can intensify
symptoms of fatigue, pain, and sexual dysfunction. In addition to counseling,
the physician may prescribe antidepressant or antianxiety medications.
Amitriptyline is used to treat laughing/weeping syndrome.
Tremors are often resistant to therapy, but can sometimes be treated with drugs or, in
extreme cases, surgery. Investigators are currently examining a number of
experimental treatments for tremor.
Interferon beta (IFNb) In 1993, based on the
results of a large multi-center placebo-controlled trial,
IFNb-1b (Betaseron®) was approved by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for the treatment of
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) in the United States (
see a map of Geographical Prevalence of MS in the US.).
Subsequently, based on an independent multi-center
placebo-controlled trial, IFNb-1a (Avonex®) has also been
approved for use in the US. Another brand of IFNb-1a (Rebif®)
is available in Europe and Canada and is currently under
consideration by the FDA for use in the US.
TheBetaseron® trial demonstrated that, compared to
treatment with placebo, treatment with 28 million
international units (MIU) per week of IFNb subcutaneously
reduced the clinical attack rate, the
MRI attack rate, and
the volume of
white matter disease seen on MRI. This trial
also showed a reduction in confirmed one-point progression
rate on the
expanded disability status scale (EDSS), however, this change was not statistically significant.
Treatment with 8 MIU/wk of
Betaseron® was also better than
placebo on several outcome measures but was, in general, not
as beneficial as the higher dose. The results of the Avonex® trial published in 1996 were substantially similar to the
earlier
Betaseron® trial. After two years, compared to
placebo, treatment with 6 MIU/wk of Avonex intramuscularly
produced a reduction in the clinical attack rate, the MRI
attack rate, and the confirmed one-point EDSS progression
rate. The total volume of white
matter disease seen on MRI was also reduced in the treated group but this was not
statistically significant.
The recently published European trial of Rebif® in
RRMS augments these two earlier studies of IFNb and demonstrated
a significant benefit on each of the four major outcome
measures in current use. Thus, compared to placebo,
treatment with 36 MIU/wk of Rebif® subcutaneously was
associated with a reduction in clinical attack rate, the MRI
attack rate, the confirmed one-point EDSS progression rate,
and the volume of white matter disease seen on MRI.
Moreover, although treatment with 18 MIU/wk of Rebif
subcutaneously was also highly effective, the higher dose of
Rebif did better than lower dose on each of these outcome
measures. In addition, two recently presented head-to-head
trials (Rebif vs. Avonex and Betaseron vs. Avonex) have
demonstrated a short-term advantage of higher dose (or more
frequently administered) IFNb in the management of patients
with RRMS.
Two recently published trials (Avonex® and Rebif®) have
demonstrated that the early treatment with IFNb of patients
who have had a single attack of suspected MS delays
significantly their progression to clinically definite MS.
Such findings offer considerable empirical support for the
notion that MS patients should be offered treatment early in
the course of their illness.
Side effects of IFNb (e.g., flu-like symptoms, fevers,
muscle pains, and injection site reactions) are not uncommon
although these typically subside with continued therapy. The
occurrence of side effects depends, in part, upon the total
dose of IFNb administered and, in part, on the route of
administration. For example, injection site reactions are
considerably less common with the intramuscular route of
administration. Also, some patients develop neutralizing
antibodies to IFNb. These antibodies may be associated with
a loss of therapeutic benefit with any of the IFNb
preparations. The actual clinical importance of these
antibodies is, however, unclear. Thus, some patients who
develop neutralizing antibodies to IFNb seem to continue
responding favorably to treatment and many patients who are
antibody positive at one point in time will revert to being
antibody negative at a future time point.
Glatiramer Acetate
A second form of
immunomodulatory treatment, glatiramer acetate (Copaxone®),
has also been approved for use in the US based on the
results of a multicenter placebo-controlled trial published
in 1995. Thus, 20 mg of Copaxone administered subcutaneously
every day was associated with a reduction in clinical attack
rate over a two year period. The confirmed one-point EDSS
progression rate was also slightly reduced but this was not
statistically significant. An earlier small pilot trial of
20 mg Copaxone subcutaneously daily reported a reduction in
both the clinical attack rate and the confirmed one-point
EDSS progression rate. MRI outcomes were not included either
in the multicenter trial or in this earlier pilot trial. In
a subsequent short-duration trial of Copaxone looking
specifically at MRI outcome measures, both MRI attack rate
and the volume of white matter disease seen on MRI have been
reported preliminarily to be significantly reduced in the
group receiving active drug, although these benefits seem to
be delayed until approximately 6 months following the onset
of therapy. Importantly,
Copaxone® is well tolerated and
generally produces fewer side effects in comparison to the
different IFNb preparations.
Based on the fact that RRMS and
Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
(SPMS) seem to represent different stages of the same
underlying disease process, one would anticipate that
treatments effective in one stage of the illness will also
be effective in another. Indeed, the results of the European
trial of Betaseron seem to offer support for this notion.
Thus, this trial also demonstrated a robust clinical benefit
of IFNb on same four outcome measures in SPMS that were
shown previously to be benefited in RRMS. Compared to
treatment with placebo, treatment with 28 MIU/wk of
Betaseron subcutaneously reduced the clinical attack rate,
the MRI attack rate, the confirmed one-point EDSS progression rate, and the volume of white matter disease
seen on MRI. Indeed, the statistical significance of the
reduction in clinical progression found in this trial was
the best for any of the IFNb trials yet. This study also
demonstrated a significant, and clinically important,
prolongation for the time to becoming wheelchair bound
during each year of Betaseron treatment.
However, the preliminary results of the American trial
of Betaseron, the results of the European trial of Rebif®,
and the preliminary results of the American trial of
Avonex®
in SPMS all failed to confirm the benefit of IFNb on
reducing the confirmed one-point EDSS progression despite
benefits seen for the clinical attack rate, the MRI attack
rate, and the volume of white matter disease seen on MRI.
These apparently disparate findings between these trials and
the earlier European Betaseron trial require clarification
and suggest that IFNb therapy may not be as useful later in
the course of disease.
Conclusions about immunomodulating treatments
The therapeutic efficacy of IFNb in the treatment of MS
is well established. Indeed, several large independent
multi-center controlled trials have demonstrated a
remarkable consistency in the therapeutic benefits provided
by this agent. Moreover, there is possibly also therapeutic
efficacy of IFNb in SPMS, although the apparent
discrepancies between the different IFNb trials requires
clarification. The therapeutic effectiveness of glatiramer
acetate (Copaxone®) in
RRMS also seems well established
although the available data is less complete. In addition,
there is only limited experience with the use of glatiramer
acetate (Copaxone®) in SPMS, although it is reasonable to
consider this agent in patients who cannot tolerate IFNb or
who continue to progress despite optimal IFNb treatment.
There is no data on the use of these agents in the treatment
of PPMS although several clinical trials are currently
underway.
Over the past several decades there has been
considerable interest in the possibility that MS might be
successfully treated with immunosuppressive agents. These
approaches have included the use of azathioprine (Imuran),
methotrexate (Rheumatrex), cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan),
cyclosporin (Sandimmune), cladribine (Leustatin),
mitoxantrone (Novantrone), total lymphoid radiation,
monoclonal antibodies, corticosteroids, intravenous
gammaglobulin, plasma exchange and bone marrow transplants.
Considering all of the evidence, and despite the often
robust effects of these agents on MRI outcome measures, the
clinical success rate for these approaches to the management
of MS patients has been disappointing. Often, initially
optimistic reports of success with a particular agent or
method are followed by larger clinical trials that have
failed to confirm the original findings. Some agents (e.g.,
glucocorticoids, azathioprine) have been studied extensively
and with repeatedly equivocal findings or demonstrating
minimal benefits. Other approaches (e.g., total lymphoid
radiation or bone marrow transplants) may carry either large
or unknown short-term risks for patients. Some of the
chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., cyclosporin.
cyclophosphamide) are both acutely toxic and, if used for
prolonged periods, carry uncertain long-term risks to
health. As a result of such difficulties, in addition to the
lack of unequivocal evidence for efficacy, the clinical use
of these agents has remained limited and, indeed, many of
the currently available agents should be considered only in
very selected circumstances.
Methotrexate
Methotrexate (Rheumatrex) is
relatively mild immunosuppressant in widespread use for
other inflammatory neurological conditions such as
myasthenia gravis or demyelinating peripheral neuropathies.
In MS, it has been reported to slow the progression of upper
extremity dysfunction in patients with SPMS, although a
comparable benefit on the progression of lower extremity
dysfunction was not demonstrated in this study. It is
generally well tolerated by patients at single weekly doses
ranging from 7.5 to 20 mg orally. Some patients experience
nausea, headache, or diarrhea but these side effects rarely
necessitate discontinuation of treatment, particularly at
the lower doses used for treating MS. Complete Blood Counts
(CBCs), in addition to tests of hepatic and renal function,
should be followed in all patients. Some patients will
develop irreversible liver damage following prolonged
treatment (>2 years) and many experts recommend a blind
liver biopsy in that setting so that drug-related hepatic
toxicity can be detected early. There also may be an
increased long-term risk of developing non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoma following therapy.
Azathioprine
Azathioprine (Imuran) is another
relatively mild immunosuppressant that has been used
primarily in SPMS. Meta-analysis of published trials
suggests that azathioprine (Imuran) is marginally effective.
It is generally administered at a total daily dose of 2-3
mg/kg with the therapeutic goal of lowering the white blood
cell count to between 3,500 and 4,000 cells/ml. This
treatment is also generally well tolerated although some
patients will experience abdominal pain or nausea.
Cyclophosphamide
Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) is a
potent immunosuppressant. It often has prominent short-term
side effects such as hair loss, nausea, vomiting, and
bleeding into the urine. The published experience using this
agent in SPMS is mixed. Initial reports were favorable
suggesting a short-term benefit from a single course of the
drug administered intravenously. However, a large
multi-center trial in Canada failed to confirm any long-term
benefit of a single course of treatment. Because of the
known toxicity of this agent, however, it is probably best
reserved for very highly selected patients (e.g., patients
in otherwise in good health, ambulatory, and aged less than
40 years) who are unresponsive to other therapies and who
continue to progress.
Cladribine
Cladribine (Leustatin) is also a potent
immunosuppressive agent that is relatively selective for
lymphocytes compared to other cell types. It has been used
successfully to treat a variety of lymphoid malignancies but
it is especially effective in the treatment of hairy-cell
leukemia. The Scripps Clinic, in two small studies, reported
fairly modest benefits to treatment in patients with either
SPMS or RRMS. These findings, however, were not been
replicated in a larger multicenter trial. Therefore, this
treatment should be considered experimental at the present
time.
Mitoxantrone
Mitoxantrone (Novantrone®) is the
most recent immunosuppressive agent reported to be of value
in the treatment of MS. This agent has been studied in both
RRMS and SPMS at doses of 12 mg/m2 and 5 mg/m2 administered
by IV infusion every 3 months for 2 years. Preliminary
results from this trial demonstrate that, compared to
placebo, treatment with high dose mitoxantrone resulted in a
significant reduction in the clinical attack rate, as well
as marginally significant reductions in MRI attack rate, the
one-point EDSS progression, and the total lesion load on
MRI. The final results of this trial are pending, although
the FDA has already approved this agent for use in MS. In
general, mitoxantrone was well tolerated, although, because
of concerns regarding potential cardiac toxicity, the
recommended total life-time dose of mitoxantrone
(Novantrone) is limited such that continuous treatment with
quarterly 12 mg/m2 mitoxantrone (Novantrone) beyond 2-3
years would not, at present, be possible. Clearly, such a
limitation will be problematic for patients expected to
require treatment over many years. There are also concerns
that the drug can increase the risk of certain cancers
developing in the future and can cause permanent sterility
in some patients. Nevertheless, this therapy may be a
reasonable alternative in selected patients who are
continuing to deteriorate despite optimal management with
other agents.
Intravenous immunoglobulin G
Intravenous
immunoglobulin G (IVIg) has also been used of in the
treatment of RRMS. Several recent trials have reported a
beneficial effect of treatment on reducing the clinical
attack rate. The findings, however, have been less
consistent for other MRI measures and for effects on
clinical disability. Moreover, the available trials have
often studied only small numbers of patients, lacked
complete clinical and MRI outcome data, or have used
methods, the validity of which has been challenged. In
addition, the treatment regimens used have been so variable
between reports that the optimal manner in which to
administer IVIg is impossible to determine. At present,
therefore, the use of IVIg in MS should be reserved for only
selected patients or for research settings.
Bone Marrow Transplant
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
is a strategy to rid the body of cells capable of
orchestrating an immune-mediated attack against myelin.
Autologous BMT (using stem cells from the same individual to
reconstitute the person’s immune system) has been attempted
in only a small number of patients with progressive forms of
MS. Although preliminary results have been encouraging, this
procedure may produce life threatening infections and some
MS patients have died following such BMT. Hetertologous BMT
(using stem cells from a different individual to
reconstitute the person’s immune system) use less intensive
immunosuppression and, therefore, carry less risk to the
health of patients. Moreover, this technique may actually
prove to be superior to autologous BMT because the
reconstituted immune system is less likely to have the
propensity to produce further bouts of MS. Additional
studies of BMT are currently underway and are clearly
necessary to define the clinical value of this experimental
approach.
Monoclonal antibodies
Monoclonal antibodies (MAB's)
are a newer strategy for modulating the body's immune system
by interfering with specific steps in the development of the
immune response against myelin. This approach differs from
traditional immunosuppression by virtue of its selectivity.
Preliminary studies have included only a small numbers of MS
patients. Some of these studies suggest that monoclonal
antibodies are promising treatments for MS. Other studies
have shown no benefit or unacceptable toxicity. The role of
monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of MS is, therefore,
still unclear.
Stem Cells
Stem Cells are being considered as a
possible means of inducing repair of the myelin sheath that
has been injured during the course of MS. One approach would
be for stem cells (cells that have the potential to become
oligodendrocytes) to be transplanted into an individual. A
second approach would be to induce stem cells already
present in a person’s body to develop into oligodendrocytes.
Both approaches are being explored.
Depression
Depression is a very common symptom in MS. Depression is
characterized by feelings of hopelessness, the inability to
enjoy things that once were pleasurable, feelings of
worthlessness, disruption of sleep, crying, feelings of
sadness or irritability, social isolation, decreased
sexuality, and in some cases, suicidal thoughts. If these
symptoms persist occur every day for two weeks or more, or
include suicidal thoughts, medical attention is required
immediately. Regardless of whether the depression is
reactive (i.e., as a result of having a serious illness),
genetic (endogenous depression), or a manifestation of the
illness itself, medications can be helpful. Individual
psychotherapy can also be helpful, either by itself or in
combination with medication. However, studies suggest that
in MS patients, depression usually requires some form of
treatment - it is unlikely to spontaneously remit. In
addition to an alteration of mood, depression may contribute
to the fatigue experienced by patients with MS and this also
may respond favorably to antidepressant medications. Useful
agents in the treatment of depression include the selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g., fluoxitine [Prozac],
20-80 mg/day or sertraline [Zoloft], 50-200 mg/day), the
tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline [Elavil],
25-150 mg/day; nortryptiline [Pamelor], 25-150 mg/day; or
desipramine [Norpramin],100-300 mg/day), and the non-tricyclic
antidepressants (e.g., venlafaxine [Effexor], 75-225
mg/day).
Fatigue
Fatigue is characterized by diminished energy and
endurance. Many patients with MS also experience an
overwhelming sense of exhaustion that requires them to sit,
recline, or fall asleep. This symptom is often aggravated by
elevated temperature and can be reversed by cooling. Fatigue
in MS can be severe and disabling. It affects almost 90% of
patients to some degree and is characterized as moderate to
severe in over half. It accounts (in part or in whole) for
the disability in approximately 65% of patients unable to
work. It is also multifactorial. Thus, depression can often
contribute to a patient’s fatigue and may be managed
successfully with anti-depressant medications. Patients who
expend exceptional effort to accomplish basic ADLs may
experience substantial fatigue and may benefit from
assistive devices, from help in the home, or from successful
management of their spasticity. Not infrequently, patients
with MS have nighttime sleep disturbances that translate
into day time fatigue. As one example, patients with
frequent nocturia (and, thus, frequent nocturnal awakenings)
may benefit from an anticholinergic medication at bedtime to
prevent these night time arousals and improve the quality of
their night time rest. In addition to these other sources of
fatigue in MS, however, there is also an extreme lassitude
that is more specifically related to the disease. This
fatigue can be the sole manifestation of an attack and is
often difficult to treat. Several effective medications are
now available for the treatment of fatigue. These
medications include amantadine (Symmetrel) 200 mg/day;
pemoline (Cylert) 37.5-75 mg/day; methylphenidate (Ritalin)
5-25 mg q day, and modafinil (Provigil) 200-400 mg/day. A
cooling vest or cap may be helpful when symptoms are
provoked by exposure to elevated temperatures.
Spasticity
Spasticity (muscle stiffness) is usually accompanied by
weakness, slowness of movement, poor coordination, and
spontaneous spasms. Spasticity poses a considerable problem
for the management of MS patients. Over 40% of patients
describe their spasticity as moderate to severe. Typically
it is most severe in the lower extremities and often
interferes substantially with a patient’s ability to
ambulate, to work, and to perform even the most basic
activities of daily living. It is often painful and
frequently associated with painful extensor (occasionally
flexor) spasms. At times, however, the increased stiffness
of the muscles may be helpful to patients by providing
non-volitional support during ambulation. In such a
circumstance, overly aggressive treatment may actually do
more harm than good. Non-pharmacological approaches to the
management of spasticity include physical therapy, regular
exercise, and stretching, which can provide substantial
relief. The avoidance of nociceptive inputs from a variety
of sources (e.g., infections, fecal impactions, bed sores,
etc.) is an extremely important first principal in patient
management because such inputs are known to increase
markedly the severity and extent of spasticity. Effective
pharmacological agents for reducing both spasticity and
spasms include lioresal (Baclofen) 20-120 mg/day; diazepam
(Valium) 2-40 mg/day, and tizanidine (Zanaflex) 8-32 mg/day.
Several other medications have also been reported to provide
occasional benefit for patients with spasticity including
clonazepam, carbamazepine, phenytoin, gabapentin,
tetrahydrocanabinol, barbiturates, and alcohol. However, the
efficacy of these agents is not well established.
When the spasticity is particularly severe and the
patient already has limited use of their lower extremities,
a surgically implanted lioresal (Baclofen) pump (delivering
the medication directly into the spinal fluid that bathes
the spinal cord) can often provide substantial relief. This
may also allow for improved hygiene and, thereby, reduce the
frequency of urinary infections and bed sores. Destructive
procedures such as selective rhyzotomy, tenotomy, myotomy,
and phenol injections should be reserved for only the most
extreme cases that are unresponsive to other measures.
Pain
Pain is an under appreciated symptom of MS. Over half of
MS patients complain of pain and, in a substantial fraction,
the pain is described as severe, at least at times.
MS-related pain can be experienced as jolts of electricity,
continuous dull burning, disagreeable tingling, or raw
sensations. An improved understanding of the mechanisms that
produce pain of central origin has produced several
successful approaches to its management, including the
anticonvulsant drugs (e.g., carbamazepine [Tegretol],
100-1000 mg/day or phenytoin [Dilantin], 300-600 mg/day or
gabapentin [Neurontin], 300-3600 mg/day), or the
antidepressant drugs (e.g., amitriptyline [Elavil], 25-150
mg/day or nortryptiline [Pamelor], 25-150 mg/day or
desipramine [Norpramin],100-300 mg/day or venlafaxine
[Effexor], 75-225 mg/day), or the anti-arrhythmic drugs
(e.g., Mexiletine [Mexitil], 300-900 mg/day). If these
treatments are unsuccessful, some patients may respond to a
comprehensive pain management program. Such persons may be
referred to the UCSF Clinical Pain Research Center.
Ataxia/Tremor
Ataxia/Tremor is a common and often intractable symptom
in MS that is difficult to treat effectively. Tremor may
involve the hand, arm, leg, head, or voice. These movements
may be barely noticeable or they can be severely
incapacitating. Some medications are occasionally helpful
including clonazepam (Klonopin), 1.5-20 mg /day, mysoline (Primadone)
50-250 mg/day, propranalol (Inderal) 40-200 mg/day, or
ondansetron (Zofran) 8-16 mg/day. The use of weights on the
wrists may occasionally reduce tremor in the arm or hand.
Unfortunately, however, the success of most attempts at
therapy is limited. Recently, there has been interest in the
use thalamotomy and/or the placement of deep brain
stimulators to control tremor. However, even in the best of
hands the response to this intervention is often partial,
the response rate is limited (~50%), the duration of any
therapeutic benefit is unknown. Moreover, the surgical
procedure itself carries risk.
Bladder Dysfunction
Several different types of bladder dysfunction occur in
MS. Not infrequently, different types of dysfunction
co-exist in the same patient and, as a result, urodynamic
testing can often provide useful clinical information.
During normal reflex voiding there is a coordinated
relaxation of the bladder sphincter that is precisely timed
to the detrusor muscle (bladder wall) contraction. The
urinary stream is stopped by a reversal of the above
mechanisms with bladder wall relaxation coordinated with
sphincter contraction. The bladder reflex is activated by
stretch of the bladder wall during filling and it can be
voluntarily inhibited. Symptoms of bladder dysfunction are
present in over 90% of patients with MS. Many of these
symptoms occur only occasionally and are quite mild. In this
circumstance, they do not require specific intervention.
Nevertheless, over 30% of MS patients experience bladder
symptoms of sufficient severity to result in episodes of
incontinence weekly or more often. Fortunately, bladder
symptoms are among the easiest MS symptoms to treat. These
symptoms include (1) urinary frequency the need to go to the
bathroom frequently; (2) urgency the need to go to the
bathroom immediately; (3) hesitancy difficulty initiating
the urine stream; and (4) retention the inability to
completely empty the bladder. Most patients can regain
continence or experience significant improvement in these
symptoms.
The first type of bladder dysfunction, results from
decreased inhibition of the bladder reflex. Symptomatically,
this decrease causes urinary frequency (having to urinate
more often than usual), urinary urgency (having to get to
the bathroom right away when you feel the urge), and
uncontrolled bladder emptying (incontinence). When these
symptoms are mild they can sometimes be treated with fluid
management techniques such as evening fluid restriction to
prevent night time incontinence or the use of frequent
voluntary voiding to prevent day time incontinence. If these
simple approaches fail to control the problem, however,
there are several medications available that can inhibit
bladder wall contraction and thereby lessen the bladder
reflex. These medications include propantheline bromide (ProBanthine)
10-15 mg/day; oxybutinin (Ditropan) 5-15 mg/day, hycosamine
sulfate (Levsin) 0.5-0.75 mg/day and tolteridine tartrate
(Detrol) 2-4 mg/day. Often the co-administration of an
over-the-counter medication such as pseudoephedrine
(Sudafed, 30-60 mg) which cause contraction of the bladder
sphincter can help maintain continence.
The second type of bladder dysfunction, results from the
loss of coordination and synchronization between the bladder
wall and sphincter muscles (dyssynergia). This results in a
difficulty initiating or stopping the urinary stream
(hesitancy) and leads to the retention of residual urine in
the bladder following voiding. Occasionally, this condition
will respond to medications such as phenoxybenzamine
(Dibenzyline, 10-20 mg/day) but more often this condition
requires the use of intermittent or continuous
catheterization. A third type of dysfunction, loss of reflex
bladder wall contraction, generally results from a
chronically over-filled bladder, which, itself, is often due
to long-standing dyssynergia. This condition can
occasionally respond to medications such as bethanecol (Urecholine),
30-150 mg/day, but often this condition also often requires
intermittent or continuous catheterization.
It is also important to monitor patients for
urinary tract infections and treat them promptly when they are
identified. Patients who have large volumes of post-void
residual urine in their bladders are predisposed to bladder
infections and patients at risk for such complications may
be identified by measuring a post-void residual volume. It
is also often helpful to take steps to prevent infections.
Acidification of the urine with cranberry juice or Vitamin C
inhibits some bacteria. Prophylactic administration of
antibiotics is sometimes necessary but may lead to bladder
colonization by resistant organisms and can result in
infections that are more difficult to treat. Intermittent
catheterization may be necessary to allow complete bladder
emptying and to prevent recurrent infections.
Bowel Dysfunction
Constipation is a common symptom in MS, occurring in
over 30% of patients. High fiber diets (often with
supplemental fiber) in addition to plenty of fluids is
usually the best approach. Natural or other laxatives can
also help. Fecal incontinence is much less common than
constipation although 17% of patients (more so in men)
report at least some episodes. If it is severe enough to
warrant treatment, fecal incontinence may respond to a
reduction in total dietary fiber.
Paroxysmal Symptoms
Several different paroxysmal syndromes occur in MS.
These syndromes are distinguished by brief duration (30
seconds to 2 minutes); high frequency of occurrence (5-40
paroxysms/day); lack of any alteration of consciousness or
change in background EEG during the events; a self-limited
nature (generally lasting only months and then subsiding).
They may be precipitated by hyperventilation or movement.
These syndromes include the familiar L’hermittes sign
(electric shock like sensations induced by neck flexion),
tonic seizures, paroxysmal dysarthria/ataxia, paroxysmal
sensory disturbances, and several other less well
characterized syndromes. These syndromes are also
distinguished by their marked responsiveness to very low
dosages of anticonvulsant medications such as carbamazepine
(Tegretol), 50-400 mg/day, phenytoin (Dilantin), 50-300
mg/day, or acetazolamide (Diamox) 200-600 mg/day. Patients
with MS may also suffer from trigeminal neuralgia (tic
douloureux) which often responds to similar medications.
Heat Sensitivity
Many symptoms are aggravated by exposure to heat or with
fever. Keeping away from the direct heat of the sun and the use of air conditioning
are often necessary to prevent these symptoms. Cooling vests
or caps may be useful in select patients.
Weakness
The potassium channel blockers (e.g., 4-amino pyridine,
10-40 mg/day; and 3,4-di-amino pyridine, 40-80 mg/day) may
help some MS symptoms (especially heat sensitive symptoms)
and anecdotally some patients experience improved function.
These drugs presumably work by prolonging the duration of
the nerve action potential and, thereby, facilitating
conduction through demyelinated fibers. At high enough doses
they may also cause seizures for similar reasons. These
agents are not FDA-approved but are currently available from
one of several compounding pharmacies around the US. More
definitive clinical trials, however, are needed to establish
any therapeutic benefit.
Sexual Dysfunction
Sexual dysfunction was reported by over 60% of the women
and over 75% of the men in a recent survey of MS patients in
northern California. The greater dysfunction in men resulted
not only from impotence (61%) but also from less sexual
desire and less demonstrated interest by their partners.
Nevertheless, sexual dysfunction can be a considerable
problem for either gender. Women experiencing sexual
dysfunction often experience numbness in the genital area,
diminished orgasmic response, unpleasant sensations, and
diminished vaginal lubrication. Men commonly report impaired
genital sensation, delayed ejaculation, decreased force of
ejaculation, and/or inability to achieve and maintain an
erection. Approaches such as couples or psychological
therapy may help in selected cases. Communication between
partners is essential. Teaching your partner how you need to
be touched or positioned can result in a return of pleasure
and excitement instead of discomfort or pain. The use of
water soluble lubricants may be an essential aid in genital
stimulation and sexual arousal. The use of vibrators may
provide pleasurable and sexually stimulating sensations.
Spasms, pain, spasticity, fatigue, and bladder/bowel
dysfunction may contribute to sexual dysfunction, and
medications to alleviate these symptoms may help. Thus, the
effective management of adductor spasticity, the use of
devices (e.g., vibrators) to make up for loss of deep
sensation, penile injections of papaverine or prostaglandin,
or prosthetic devices to assist with maintaining erection
may also be helpful in some circumstances. The biggest
advance in treatment of impotence, however, has been the
introduction of
sildenafil (Viagra) 50-100 mg orally 1-2
hours prior to sex.
Memory Problems
Cognitive problems, including problems with memory, are
common in MS. Between 45% and 65% of people with MS will
have some problems with cognitive functioning. Donepezil HCl
(Aricept) is a cholinesterase inhibiting medication used to
treat patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. Two small,
non-randomized, uncontrolled studies have shown benefit for
MS patients with memory problems taking 10 mg/day. Similar
small, uncontrolled studies have also shown benefits for
patients with memory problems due to traumatic brain injury.
Larger, placebo-controlled studies are underway with both
these populations. While this medication is not currently
approved by the FDA for the treatment of memory problems in
patients with MS, it may be of some benefit in some
cases.
(I researched the symptoms and created this page from many
websites.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|